Marshall v. Ranne
Texas Supreme Court
511 S.W.2d 255 (1974)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Ranne’s (defendant) hog escaped from his farm and was roaming on Marshall’s (plaintiff) farm. Marshall, knowing that the hog was dangerous, left his house to go into town. When Marshall was walking to his car, the hog attacked and bit his hand. Marshall sued Ranne for his injuries. At trial, Marshall testified that he had seen the hog charge on other occasions, but the hog had never done damage. The trial court ruled that Marshall had assumed the risk by leaving his house because he knew that the hog was dangerous. The trial court thus ruled in favor of Ranne. The court of civil appeals affirmed. Marshall appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pope, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.