From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Marshall v. Ranne
Texas Supreme Court
511 S.W.2d 255 (1974)
Ranne’s (defendant) hog escaped from his farm and was roaming on Marshall’s (plaintiff) farm. Marshall, knowing that the hog was dangerous, left his house to go into town. When Marshall was walking to his car, the hog attacked and bit his hand. Marshall sued Ranne for his injuries. At trial, Marshall testified that he had seen the hog charge on other occasions, but the hog had never done damage. The trial court ruled that Marshall had assumed the risk by leaving his house because he knew that the hog was dangerous. The trial court thus ruled in favor of Ranne. The court of civil appeals affirmed. Marshall appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Pope, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 605,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.