Marshall v. Sam Dell’s Dodge Corp.
United States District Court for the Northern District of New York
451 F. Supp. 294 (1978)
Facts
Ray Marshall (plaintiff), United States secretary of labor, brought an action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) against Sam Dell’s Dodge Corporation (Dell) (defendant), an automobile dealership, alleging that Dell violated the overtime requirements of the FLSA with respect to 117 salespeople. During the time relevant to the litigation, the minimum wage ranged from $1.60 to $2.65 per hour. Dell paid its sales staff under an evolving set of plans. Generally, however, each salesperson received base pay of $56 per week plus various commissions and bonuses. Dell also furnished many of the salespeople with demonstrator vehicles, or demos. The salespeople were permitted to drive the demos for personal use; however, Dell told them that the demos were not for their families, and the employees primarily used the cars in connection with their job duties. Although one of the changes to Dell’s compensation plans indicated that the value of the use of the demo vehicles would be reported to the Internal Revenue Service on a Form 1099, it did not appear that Dell ever did so, and Dell’s payroll records did not account for the demos. Dell’s timekeeping records grossly understated the number of hours the sales staff worked. The salespeople actually worked an average of at least 55 hours per week, but Dell required them to sign time slips purporting to show that they were working 36 hours per week. All the salespeople had weeks in which they received only the $56 weekly base pay and no commissions or bonuses. During those weeks, the salespeople were paid less than the minimum wage.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Port, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 707,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.