From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Vulcan Materials Co.
Delaware Supreme Court
68 A.3d 1208 (2012)
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (Martin) (plaintiff) and Vulcan Materials Co. (Vulcan) (defendant) were the two largest companies in the construction-aggregates industry. The two companies had been discussing a potential merger for several years. In 2010, the CEOs of the two companies began seriously discussing a merger. The two CEOs agreed any information exchanged during discussions would be used to facilitate a friendly deal only. The two companies entered into a nondisclosure agreement and a confidentiality agreement that prohibited either party from disclosing evaluation material unless legally required. The agreements provided a notice-and-vetting process for disclosure of confidential information if one party wished to disclose information. Merger talks faltered, and Martin ended up attempting a hostile takeover of Vulcan by making an unsolicited exchange offer. Martin sent Vulcan a bear-hug letter and filed a Form S-4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In conjunction with its hostile takeover bid, Martin disclosed Vulcan’s confidential information both publicly and to advisors. Martin made an exchange offer and initiated a proxy contest for control of Vulcan’s board. Martin brought an action against Vulcan in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The chancery court found Martin had violated the nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements and enjoined Martin from prosecuting its exchange offer and proxy contest for four months. Martin appealed to the Delaware Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Jacobs, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.