Martin v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.

54 F. Supp. 780 (1983)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Martin v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
54 F. Supp. 780 (1983)

Facts

Billie J. Martin (plaintiff) was an alcoholic who had been drinking at the Sassy B. Lounge. While Martin was intoxicated, he made a bet that he could climb a utility pole across the street. Martin managed to climb the pole, but when he reached the top, he touched an electrical line carrying 8,000 volts. Martin sustained a severe electrical shock and lost his right arm slightly below the elbow and his right leg slightly below the knee. Marin sued Louisiana Power and Light Company (Louisiana Power) (defendant). Louisiana Power moved for summary judgment, arguing that Marin was guilty of contributory negligence and that his conduct barred recovery. Martin argued that he was not guilty of contributory negligence because he lacked volition due to his alcoholism. Martin submitted a report and affidavit by a psychiatrist showing that Martin was an alcoholic who suffered from organic brain disease. Both parties have stipulated that Martin was an alcoholic, that he was intoxicated when he climbed the utility pole, and that the first step on the utility pole was six feet four-and-a-half inches off the ground.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wicker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership