Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
M

Martin v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority

225 F. Supp. 2d 1362 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Martin v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
225 F. Supp. 2d 1362 (2002)

DD

Facts

The Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (transit authority) was a public entity that operated a mass-transit system. The transit authority’s policy was to provide schedule information in braille upon request. But visually impaired people who requested schedule information in braille did not receive this information from the transit authority. Moreover, although the transit authority published schedule information on its website, the website was not decipherable to the text-reader software used by visually impaired people. A group of individuals with disabilities (plaintiffs) brought suit against the transit authority, contending that it violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The individuals with disabilities filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, seeking an order requiring the transit authority to make schedule information available in formats accessible to visually impaired people. Along with the motion, the individuals with disabilities produced evidence indicating that the transit authority engaged in a pattern of discrimination against visually impaired people. The transit authority did not offer evidence showing that it would be damaged by the injunction. The district court took the motion under advisement.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thrash, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Disability Law

Key Terms