Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Marvin Feldman v. Mexico

International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
42 I.L.M. 625 (2003)


Facts

Marvin Feldman (plaintiff), a United States citizen, owned a Mexican corporation, CEMSA, which bought cigarettes in Mexico (defendant) from stores for export. The only other cigarette-exporting companies belonged to the Poblano Group. Mexican law provided a rebate for the tax of cigarettes that were exported. To get the rebate, the invoice for the purchase of the cigarettes had to show the amount of tax paid for the production and first sale of the cigarettes separately from the total purchase price. Only manufacturers had access to invoices that showed the amount of the taxes paid. Stores were not provided an invoice that itemized the taxes. Manufacturers would not sell to any exporters or provide the required tax information; therefore, it was impossible for any exporter to provide the required documentation to receive the rebate. Still, Mexico paid rebates to CEMSA for several years and to Poblano Group. Eventually, Mexico stopped providing rebates to CEMSA and demanded repayment of past rebates. Mexico continued to pay rebates to Poblano Group and never sought repayment. Additionally, a new law required cigarette exporters to register with the state. CEMSA filed for arbitration under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), asserting that Mexico expropriated its investment by withholding the rebate and violated the national-treatment provision by favoring Poblano Group. After the arbitration filing, Mexico audited and then denied CEMSA’s registration. Meanwhile, Mexico accepted Poblano Group’s registration.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.