From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...
Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States
United States Supreme Court
572 U.S. 93 (2014)
Under the Railroad Right-of-Way Act of 1875, the United States government (plaintiff) granted railroad companies rights of way to help spur a transcontinental railroad. In 1976, the United States granted a parcel of land to the Brandt family (defendant), subject to a right-of-way the government had granted to Laramie, Hahn’s Peak & Pacific Railroad Company in 1908. The grant to the Brandts did not specify what would happen if the railroad abandoned the right-of-way. In 2004, the railroad company’s successor abandoned the right-of-way. The government sued the Brandt family, seeking a declaratory judgment that it owned the abandoned right-of-way. The government claimed that it owned a reversionary interest in the right-of-way and that upon abandonment, the right-of-way reverted to the government. The district court granted the government summary judgment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, C.J.)
Dissent (Sotomayor, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.