Mary Frances Allen v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
16 T.C. 163 (1951)
Mary Frances Allen (plaintiff) visited the Metropolitan Museum of Art wearing a valuable brooch. She had the brooch pinned on her dress at 4:30 p.m. that day but realized at 5:00 p.m. that it was gone. At the time, there were about 5,000 people in the museum. Allen did not witness how the brooch went missing. She offered no evidence as to the type of clasp on the brooch, whether she bumped into anyone in the crowd, or whether her dress was damaged as a result of the pin’s removal. Allen sought to deduct the value of the brooch as a loss by theft. The Commissioner (defendant) disallowed the deduction.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Van Fossan, J.)
Dissent (Opper, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.