Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Maryland Reclamation Associates v. Harford County

Court of Appeals of Maryland
994 A.2d 842 (2010)


Facts

In February 1990, Maryland Reclamation Associates (MRA) (plaintiff) purchased property located in Harford County (defendant). MRA sought to use the land for a rubble landfill. Before the purchase, the county had decided to include the property in its Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP), and the state issued an environmental permit for a landfill at the site. The project’s inclusion in the SWMP was achieved by a vote of four of seven council members: two abstained because of inadequate information; one abstained because his son was the president of MRA. Hundreds attended the approval hearings, held in November 1989, in opposition to the rubble landfill. The county ultimately adopted a zoning amendment that imposed new conditions on rubble landfill sites and required use variances. MRA sued the city to allow the rubble landfill on the theory that it had a vested right to proceed with its plan. The trial court held that MRA did not have a vested right to construct the rubble landfill. MRA’s instant appeal invoked zoning estoppel by alleging that it had spent over one million dollars for the land purchase and engineering fees after relying on the city’s inclusion of the landfill site in its SWMP.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Adkins, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 200,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.