United States Supreme Court
527 U.S. 465 (1999)
Dyson (defendant) was a known drug dealer. Police received a tip from an informant that Dyson was carrying illegal drugs. The informant described the vehicle and gave police the license plate number. Police stopped and searched the vehicle. After finding drugs, the police arrested Dyson. Dyson was convicted at trial. Dyson appealed arguing that the search violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The Maryland Court of Special Appeals reversed Dyson’s convictions because it concluded that police could only conduct a constitutionally permissible warrantless vehicle search under exigent circumstances. The state of Maryland (plaintiff) appealed the ruling in state court, but was denied certiorari. The state appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 237,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.