Mascorro v. Billings

656 F.3d 1198 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mascorro v. Billings

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
656 F.3d 1198 (2011)

  • Written by Arlyn Katen, JD

Facts

Deputy sheriff Billings (defendant) attempted to pull over seventeen-year-old Joshua Burchett for driving without taillights. The boy instead drove two blocks, ran inside his parents’ house, and hid in the bathroom. Burchett’s mother and stepfather, Christina and Jose Mascorro (plaintiffs), woke up to Billings cursing and kicking their door, the sole entry point for their house. When Jose opened the door, Billings pointed a gun at his head and ordered him to his knees. Soon afterward, Billings pepper-sprayed Christina, her fourteen-year-old son, and Jose directly in their faces. Billings and two other officers ordered Burchett to leave the bathroom. When Burchett refused, an officer kicked down the bathroom door and arrested him. Police and an ambulance escorted the Mascorros and their fourteen-year-old son to the hospital. The Mascorros were charged with obstructing a police officer, and Christina was charged with aggravated assault and battery on a police officer because she allegedly poked Billings in the chest. When the Mascorros returned home from jail, they found their belongings trashed and a hole in a wall. The state court dismissed the Mascorros’ criminal charges, after determining that Billings illegally entered their home. The Mascorros then sued the three officers in federal court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming unlawful entry, excessive use of force, false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution. The district court dismissed a few of the claims, but it otherwise denied the officers’ summary-judgment motions, determining that the officers did not have qualified immunity and could be sued. The officers appealed the denial of qualified immunity before trial began.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (O’Brien, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership