Mason v. Adams County Recorder

901 F.3d 753 (2018)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mason v. Adams County Recorder

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
901 F.3d 753 (2018)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

Darryl Mason (plaintiff), an African American resident of Ohio, filed an action in federal district court under the Fair Housing Act against the Adams County recorder (the county) (defendant). Mason claimed the county had violated the Fair Housing Act by including racially restrictive covenants in land records spanning from 1922 to 1957. Although the county no longer enforced the racially restrictive covenants, Mason argued that permitting the restrictive covenants to remain in the chain of title violated the Fair Housing Act because the act prohibited documents related to the sale or rental of a dwelling that indicated discriminatory behavior based on race. Mason further alleged that he felt unwelcome to buy property with racially restrictive covenants in the chain of title. The county moved to dismiss the case for lack of standing. The district court found that Mason lacked standing because he had not suffered an actual or threatened injury distinct to him, the alleged injury was not caused by the county, and the county had no authority to erase the restrictive covenants from the records. Mason appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Boggs, J.)

Concurrence (Clay, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership