Mason v. Mason

775 N.E.2d 706 (2002)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mason v. Mason

Indiana Court of Appeals
775 N.E.2d 706 (2002)

Facts

In the 1980s, John Mason (plaintiff) traveled from Indiana to Tennessee to stay with his first cousin, Bonnie Mason (defendant). In 1986, John and Bonnie were married in Tennessee. John and Bonnie could not be legally married in Indiana as first cousins under the age of 65, but Tennessee law allowed such marriages. Three months after the marriage, John and Bonnie returned to Indiana, despite their apparent knowledge of Indiana’s law forbidding the marriage. In 1991, John was convicted of murder and sentenced to the Indiana Department of Corrections. Between 1991 and 2002, Bonnie provided John with funds to support his two children from a prior marriage and transferred certain assets from John to her name. On January 10, 2000, John filed for an annulment of the marriage, asserting the marriage was void under Indiana Code Section 31-11-8-3. On March 23, 2000, Bonnie filed an answer and a counterclaim, seeking the dissolution of the marriage. The trial court found the marriage was valid under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution. John appealed to the Indiana Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Baker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership