Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia
United States Supreme Court
427 U.S. 307 (1976)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
Robert Murgia (plaintiff) was a uniformed police officer with the Massachusetts state police. The Massachusetts Board of Retirement (defendant) retired him at age fifty. Murgia brought a civil suit against the Board in federal district court on the grounds that his forced retirement violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court dismissed the suit, but the court of appeals reversed. The Massachusetts Board of Retirement appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
Dissent (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 780,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.