Massee v. Thompson

90 P.3d 394 (2004)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Massee v. Thompson

Montana Supreme Court
90 P.3d 394 (2004)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Vickie Massee (Vickie) had three children: James, Michael, and Marcus Massee (the Massees) (plaintiffs). In 1990, Vickie married Ray Doggett (Ray), and thereafter, Vickie and her children lived with Ray. Vickie and Ray had a turbulent, violent relationship. Police officers of Broadwater County (defendant), led by Sheriff Richard Thompson (defendant) received frequent calls relating to domestic disturbances. The calls usually followed bouts of heavy drinking by Ray, Vickie, or both, and Ray suffered from depression. For example, in 1994, Ray called the sheriff threatening to commit suicide after he had had an argument with Vickie. Officers found Ray with a loaded pistol, which was confiscated but returned to Ray soon afterward. In an incident two months later, Ray wielded his gun in front of officers and held it to Vickie’s head. Thompson, who responded to the home, did not arrest Ray, seize the gun, or inform Vickie of her victim’s rights. In 1996, another domestic incident occurred in which a suicidal Ray pointed a gun at James and Vickie’s friend. Once again, Thompson did not arrest Ray, seize the weapon, or provide Vickie with resources. In 1997, eight-year-old Marcus called the sheriff’s office, reporting an argument between Ray and Vickie. Responding officers removed the bullets from Ray’s loaded gun but otherwise left the gun and the bullets on the premises. In May 1997, Ray called the sheriff’s office, reporting that he was extremely depressed and suicidal. Later that month, Ray shot and killed Vickie and himself. The Massees sued Thompson for negligence in failing to prevent Vickie’s death. Following a jury trial, the jury found in favor of the Massees. The county and Thompson appealed, arguing that the sheriff was immune from liability unless the sheriff had a special relationship with Vickie. The Massees countered that a special relationship existed by virtue of the state’s domestic-violence statutes.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cotter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership