United States Supreme Court
377 U.S. 201 (1964)
Massiah (defendant) was indicted for violating federal narcotics laws. With the assistance of counsel, he pleaded not guilty and was released on bail. Unbeknownst to Massiah, a co-defendant, Colson, had agreed to cooperate with the police. A few days after Massiah was released on bail, Colson, wearing a wire so the police could hear what Massiah said, initiated a conversation with Massiah where Massiah made incriminating statements. These statements were then introduced at trial. Massiah was convicted of several drug offenses. The court of appeals affirmed the convictions. Massiah argued that the statements were introduced at trial in violation of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)
Dissent (White, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 203,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.