Massiah v. United States
United States Supreme Court
377 U.S. 201 (1964)
- Written by Sarah Venti, JD
Facts
Winston Massiah (defendant) was indicted for violating federal narcotics laws. With the assistance of counsel, Massiah pleaded not guilty and was released on bail. Unbeknownst to Massiah, a codefendant, Colson, had agreed to cooperate with the police. A few days after Massiah was released on bail, police officers installed a listening device in Colson’s car. While Colson and Massiah were sitting in Colson’s car, Colson initiated a conversation with Massiah in which Massiah made incriminating statements. The prosecution later introduced Massiah’s incriminating statements at trial. Massiah’s defense counsel objected, but the court admitted the statements, and the jury ultimately convicted Massiah of several drug offenses. The court of appeals affirmed the convictions. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)
Dissent (White, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.