Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Mateo-Woodburn v. Fresno Community Hospital

Court of Appeal of California, Fifth District
270 Cal.Rptr. 894 (1990)


Facts

The anesthesiology department at Fresno Community Hospital (FCH) (defendant) operated as an “open staff,” meaning the anesthesiologists practicing at FCH were independent and competing entrepreneurs with medical staff privileges at the hospital. As a result of the “open staff” system, miscommunication among physicians and staff increased, scheduling delays increased, and other deficiencies led to concerns regarding patient safety. The FCH Board of Trustees made a determination to go from an “open staff” system to a “closed” system. Under the “closed” system, FCH agreed to close down the anesthesiology department and to contract with Dr. William Hass to deliver all anesthesia services to the hospital through individual contractual agreements with anesthesiologists. Under the terms of the FCH-Hass agreement, Hass had authority to select physicians and regulate the physicians’ hours. Seven of the thirteen anesthesiologists signed the contract with Hass, five refused to sign, and one was not offered the opportunity to sign later testified that he would not have signed the agreement if it had been offered. The five physicians, including Mateo-Woodburn (plaintiffs), filed suit against FCH and others challenging the Board of Trustees’ decision and alleging that their medical staff privileges were unlawfully terminated, modified, or curtained. Trial court found for FCH and the physicians appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 236,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.