Mathews v. New York Racing Association, Inc.

193 F.Supp. 293 (1961)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mathews v. New York Racing Association, Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
193 F.Supp. 293 (1961)

SC
Play video

Facts

In a previous lawsuit against employees of the New York Racing Association, Inc. (NYRA), Joseph Mathews (plaintiff) alleged that the employees made libelous statements about him on many occasions, including statements about his disorderly conduct charge and trial for disorderly conduct that occurred on April 10, 1958. Mathews also alleged that NYRA’s private investigators assaulted him at Jamaica Race Track on April 4, 1958. The court found against Mathews on all claims. Subsequently, Mathews brought this action against NYRA and its private investigators (defendants). Mathews again alleged that the investigators assaulted him and also that they kidnapped him, falsely arrested him, and falsely imprisoned him at Jamaica Race Track on April 4, 1958. Mathews further alleged that the defendants had incorrectly charged him with disorderly conduct and had maliciously prosecuted him, resulting in his conviction in the Magistrate's Court of the City of New York on April 10, 1958. The defendants moved for summary judgment, asserting that the court's decision in the previous lawsuit was res judicata on the claims alleged in Mathews's complaint.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (MacMahon, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership