Matos by and through Matos v. Clinton School District
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
350 F. Supp. 2d 303 (2003)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Alma Matos (plaintiff) was a senior at Clinton High School enrolled in a journalism class taught by Marguerite Foley. As the instructor, Foley routinely reviewed assignments that students completed on school computers and printed on school printers. School policy forbade students from using school computers for non-school-related purposes. During Foley’s class, Matos used a school computer to type offensive allegations against Foley and the school’s principal, including allegations that Foley and the principal were in a sexual relationship. Matos then printed the document containing the allegations on a school printer and placed the document in her personal journal. After Matos refused Foley’s request to see the document, Foley took the document and sent Matos to the principal’s office. The principal read the document and called Matos’s mother to the school. The principal informed Matos and her mother that he was suspending Matos for 10 days. Matos sued Foley, the principal, and the school district (defendants) in district court, seeking an injunction to expunge her suspension and to prevent the district from disclosing information about it to third parties, such as colleges. Among other allegations, Matos alleged that Foley violated Matos’s Fourth Amendment right not to be subjected to an unreasonable search. Matos applied for a preliminary injunction until the case was decided on the merits.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gorton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.