Mattel, Inc. v. Walking Mountain Productions
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
353 F.3d 792 (2003)
- Written by Sarah Holley, JD
Facts
Thomas Forsythe (defendant) was a photographer who produced photographs with social and political implications. Forsythe created a series of photographs entitled “Food Chain Barbie” that depicted Mattel, Inc.’s (plaintiff) Barbie doll in absurd and often sexualized positions posed with various kitchen appliances. Forsythe described the message behind his photographic series as an attempt to critique the objectification of women associated with Barbie. Forsythe showcased and promoted his photographic series with limited market success. Mattel filed suit against Forsythe for copyright infringement and other causes of action. The district court ruled in Forsythe’s favor after finding that his photographic series featuring Mattel’s Barbie doll were parodies entitled to the fair-use defense. Mattel appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pregerson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
