Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Matter of A-M-

Board of Immigration Appeals
25 I. & N. Dec. 66 (2009)


Facts

The respondent was a Mexican citizen. In 1984, the respondent married her first husband, who was a United States citizen, in Mexico. In 1989, the respondent legally moved to the United States to live with her first husband. The respondent’s first husband physically and mentally abused her. In 1996, the couple separated. In 2001, the respondent became a legal permanent resident of the United States due to her status as a battered spouse under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA). In 2003, the respondent was convicted of driving under the influence. In 2004, the respondent finalized her divorce with her first husband. Also in 2004, the respondent brought two minor children who were not hers into the United States. The United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) initiated removal proceedings against the respondent. The respondent moved for special rule cancellation of removal for battered spouses under a provision in the INA. While the proceedings were pending, the respondent remarried. The respondent’s second husband was not abusive. The respondent had not seen her first husband since 1998. The respondent had three children legally living in the United States and presented evidence that she had a job, but failed to provide evidence that she filed income taxes. The immigration judge granted the respondent’s request for special rule cancellation of removal. The DHS appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Cole, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.