Matter of Acosta
Board of Immigration Appeals
19 I.& N. Dec. 211 (1985)
Acosta (plaintiff), a citizen of El Salvador, fled his country because he feared for his life. He had worked for a taxi collective in El Salvador, and was repeatedly threatened by guerillas who wanted to disrupt transportation service in the city of San Salvador. Some of his friends and colleagues in the taxi business were beaten or killed. In the United States, Acosta was found to be deportable. He applied for a discretionary grant of asylum and withholding of deportation pursuant to §§ 208 and 243(h), respectively, of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The immigration judge denied Acosta’s applications because Acosta failed to meet his burden of proof. Acosta appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.