Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Matter of Andrew R.

Family Court of New York
115 Misc.2d 937 (1982)


Facts

Andrew R. (defendant) was a 13-year-old boy who had some minor emotional issues but was otherwise an intelligent and well-behaved child. Despite not wanting to do so, Andrew was persuaded by his father (plaintiff) to voluntarily enter a residential treatment center (the center) for what Andrew believed was to be only one month. However, Andrew’s father left Andrew at the center for seven months without any judicial review of whether Andrew’s placement was warranted. Andrew ran away from the center, returned home, and pleaded with his father not to force Andrew to return to the center. When Andrew’s father demanded that Andrew return to the center, Andrew threatened to kill his father. Andrew’s father handed Andrew a knife and told Andrew to go ahead and do so. Andrew did not. Subsequently, Andrew’s father filed a petition alleging that Andrew was a person in need of supervision (PINS), because Andrew was beyond the lawful control of his parents and was consistently truant from school. During a fact-finding hearing in which Andrew and his father were the only testifying witnesses, the attorney representing Andrew’s father attempted to elicit testimony from Andrew about additional alleged misbehavior that was not set specifically forth in the petition. The family court sustained an objection by the guardian ad litem as a matter of law and constitutional due process. The family court ruled on the petition.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Leddy, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.