Matter of Avetisyan
Board of Immigration Appeals
25 I & N Dec. 688 (2012)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Bavakan Avetisyan (plaintiff) was a citizen of Armenia who had come to the United States on a nonimmigrant visa for special studies and who overstayed the terms of the visa. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (defendant) began removal proceedings against Avetisyan. During removal proceedings before an immigration judge, Avetisyan admitted that she had overstayed her visa but applied for relief from the removal. Her request for relief from removal was based on the facts that her husband was in the process of becoming a naturalized citizen and they were the parents of a United States citizen child. Avetisyan further attested that upon her husband’s naturalization, he would file a visa petition on her behalf. The immigration judge continued the proceedings to await proof of Avetisyan’s husband’s naturalization. After her husband became a citizen, he filed a visa petition for Avetisyan, but DHS’s processing of the visa was inexplicably delayed for many months. After issuing multiple continuances to wait for the adjudication of the visa to be finalized, the immigration judge finally administratively closed the proceedings over DHS’s objections. DHS brought the matter to the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Miller, Board Member)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.