Board of Immigration Appeals
19 I. & N. Dec. 203 (1984)
Ching and Chen (plaintiffs) were citizens of China who were traveling from Hong Kong to Guatemala via Tokyo and Los Angeles on a commercial airline. Upon arrival at Los Angeles International Airport, the carrier (i.e. the airline) presented the group to Immigration for inspection and admission under a transit without visa (TRWOV) privilege. The immigration officer denied them entry as TRWOVs and directed the carrier to put them on the next flight to Hong Kong. Ching and Chen agreed to return to Hong Kong, but while they were awaiting removal in the airline’s custody, they snuck out of the airport. They were caught two days later on a bus at a border patrol in Texas. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) (defendant) apprehended them. The INS placed them in exclusion proceedings, but Ching and Chen argued that the exclusion proceedings should be terminated, because they should only be properly subject to deportation proceedings on the grounds that they had effectively entered the U.S. without inspection when they escaped. Ching and Chen cited a factually similar case, Matter of A-, 9 I & N Dec. 356 (BIA 1961), in which a stowaway escaped from carrier custody, landed on shore, and remained in the United States for two years, after which he was deemed to have made an “entry” and was thus subject only to deportation proceedings. The INS argued that a case called Matter of Lin, 18 I & N Dec. 219 (BIA 1982) should control. There, an alien who escaped from an INS detention facility while awaiting exclusion hearings did not make an entry into the United States and thus was subject to exclusion proceedings. The immigration judge found in favor of Ching and Chen and terminated exclusion proceedings. The INS appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Dunne, Ch.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.