Matter of DISH Network Derivative Litigation
Nevada Supreme Court
401 P.3d 1081 (Nev. 2017)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Shareholder Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund (Jacksonville) brought a derivative action on behalf of Nevada corporation DISH Network Corporation (DISH) (plaintiffs) challenging actions taken by chairman and chief executive officer Charles Ergen and 10 other executives and directors (defendants) after DISH acquired debt in a company that filed bankruptcy. Named directors included Ergen’s wife, Cantey Ergen, the Ergens’ close personal friends Tom Oltorf and George Brokaw, and independent directors Charles Lillis and Thomas Cullen. Initially the board appointed a special litigation committee (SLC) composed of Oltorf and Brokaw to investigate Jacksonville’s claims. When Jacksonville challenged the SLC’s independence because of Oltorf and Brokaw’s close ties to the Ergens, the board added Lillis and provided the SLC could not act without his affirmative vote. The SLC monitored the bankruptcy proceedings and conducted a comprehensive investigation for almost a year, conducting interviews, reviewing documents, obtaining legal advice, and holding multiple meetings. The SLC concluded Jacksonville’s claims should be dismissed and moved the court to defer to that determination. Jacksonville again challenged the SLC’s independence. The court found Lillis was independent, which, combined with the voting structure, made the SLC independent; deferred to the SLC’s determination; and dismissed the case. Jacksonville appealed, arguing Lillis lacked independence solely because he and Cullen had worked together before and saw each other socially once or twice a year, without challenging the finding that Lillis lacked financial or business connections to others in the lawsuit beyond serving on DISH’s board.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gibbons, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.