Matter of Estate of Zent
North Dakota Supreme Court
459 N.W.2d 795 (1990)
Ann Johnson (plaintiff) met John Zent in 1979. Johnson and Zent had a personal relationship until Zent’s death in 1988. Johnson filed a claim against Zent’s estate (Estate) (defendant) for compensation for services that she had rendered to Zent prior to his passing. Johnson testified that, as Zent suffered from strokes and Alzheimer’s disease, she became his “houseservant and nursemaid.” Johnson testified that Zent was physically incapacitated for the last three years of his life and mentally incapacitated for the last year. Johnson’s testimony was corroborated by Zent’s treating physician. The Estate disallowed Johnson’s claim in its entirety. Johnson requested a hearing in county court, which found that there was no express or implied contract and no unjust enrichment. The county court found that Johnson had conferred her services gratuitously. Johnson appealed, arguing that the county court had erred in finding that there was no unjust enrichment or implied-in-law contract.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Levine, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.