Matter of Green Charitable Trust

431 N.W.2d 492 (1988)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Matter of Green Charitable Trust

Michigan Court of Appeals
431 N.W.2d 492 (1988)

SC

Facts

Leslie and Edith Green established a charitable trust in favor of St. Peter’s Home for Boys, the Cathedral Church of St. Paul, and the Cathedral of the Episcopal Church, Diocese of Michigan (the beneficiaries) (plaintiffs). The Greens named themselves, as well as Comerica Bank and Miles Jaffe (defendants), as trustees. The trust was funded by a partial interest in the Greens’ farm. In 1973, Mr. Green died, and his will created a marital trust for Mrs. Green with his interest in the farm. Comerica was the sole trustee of the marital trust. At this time, Leo Majzels was hired to appraise the farm. In 1983, Mrs. Green died and left the residue of her estate, including her interest in the farm, to the charitable trust. Comerica served as executor of Mrs. Green’s estate. At this point, the ownership of the farm was split between the charitable trust, the marital trust, and Mrs. Green’s estate. Comerica hired Majzels as a consultant to advise on an appropriate asking price for the farm. Majzels told Comerica and Jaffe that a reasonable sale price for the farm’s homestead would be between $3 and $3.5 million. Jaffe testified that Jaffe and Comerica did not want a formal appraisal early in the sale process because it would cap any potential asking price. Comerica sold the homestead portion of the property to Maurice Cohen for $3.25 million. Jaffe, an attorney, represented Cohen in the sale and had represented Cohen on other matters previously. Jaffe disclosed to the beneficiaries his representation of Cohen on the sale but did not disclose his history of representing Cohen in other matters. Acknowledging a potential conflict, Jaffe had stated that he would not serve as trustee with respect to any offer by Cohen, but Jaffe did not formally resign as trustee of the Greens’ charitable trust. The beneficiaries sued Comerica and Jaffe, alleging that they violated their fiduciary duties as trustees. The probate court found in the beneficiaries’ favor. Comerica and Jaffe appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hood, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership