Matter of H–
Board of Immigration Appeals
9 I & N Dec. 640 (1962)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
The petitioner (plaintiff) was a citizen of the United States who was an adherent to the Muslim faith. She married a Jordanian citizen in Jordan. The marriage was legal in Jordan but polygamous because her husband was already married to another woman. Her husband later legally divorced his first wife. The petitioner filed for a visa for her husband to enter the United States under immediate-relative status. Immigration officials denied the visa petition on the grounds that the marriage was polygamous and therefore invalid for immigration purposes because the petitioner had married her husband before he divorced his first wife. The petitioner appealed the decision, and the case came before the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.