Matter of H-L-S-A
Board of Immigration Appeals
28 I&N Dec. 228 (2021)

- Written by Kelli Lanski, JD
Facts
H-L-S-A (defendant) was a native and citizen of El Salvador. He entered the United States without permission, was apprehended, and was removed. After returning to El Salvador, he learned that a family member had been killed by the MS-13 gang for failing to pay extortion money to the gang. He was advised that MS-13 gang members were looking for him, too, and that he was not safe in El Salvador. H-L-S-A decided to reenter the United States and remained there for the next 10 years before he was arrested for illegally reentering the country after removal. He was placed in a detention facility, where MS-13 gang members, including his cellmate, demanded he pay them money for protection. He obliged. After learning that his cellmate also had a weapon, H-L-S-A went to the warden, told him about the weapon and extortion, and asked to be placed into protective custody. H-L-S-A was transferred to another facility. He went back to the first facility for a hearing, and several gang members shouted at him that he was a rat. H-L-S-A met with prosecutors and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents to discuss his knowledge of gang activity in the detention center. He confirmed the identity of MS-13 gang members from photos the FBI showed him. During H-L-S-A’s immigration proceeding, he asked to stay in the United States based on the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT). H-L-S-A argued that there was a clear probability that he would be persecuted based on his membership in a valid social group if he returned to El Salvador. The social group he identified comprised prosecutorial witnesses. The immigration judge (IJ) found that this was not a valid social group under CAT and denied H-L-S-A’s request for relief from removal. H-L-S-A appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Malphrus, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 965,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

