Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Matter of Kohama

Associate Commissioner, Examinations
17 I & N Dec. 257 (1978)


Facts

Kohama (plaintiff) and his wife entered the United States as nonimmigrant visitors on December 10, 1975 and were authorized to stay until March 16, 1976. On March 23, 1976 their daughter, a United States citizen, filed visa petitions on their behalf based on their status as immediate relatives to a United States citizen. Applications were concurrently filed to adjust their status to that of permanent residents under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. The visas were approved. The District Director denied the status adjustment because although the daughter and her husband had submitted affidavits of support, they did not post two $5,000 bonds to insure they would not become dependent on the state. The son-in-law filed a motion to reopen and reconsider, in which he described how he and his wife have supported her parents for years, and that his wife has three employed siblings who could also help if needed. The District Director considered the motion and affirmed the denial.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 250,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.