Matter of Marion Graham

No. 88-INA-102 (1990)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Matter of Marion Graham

Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals
No. 88-INA-102 (1990)

Play video

Facts

Marion Graham, a United States citizen, (petitioner) submitted an application for labor certification for Gladys Yolanda Ulloa, an immigrant, for a live-in housekeeper position. On the application, Graham described the various duties required for the position. One of the conditions of employment was that the housekeeper had to live in Graham’s home. The Department of Labor denied Graham’s application on the basis that the live-in requirement was unduly restrictive, and thus in violation of 20 C.F.R. 656.21(b)(2), which requires that employers wishing to hire aliens on a permanent basis list the potential job without unduly restrictive requirements. Under the statute, a requirement that a worker live on the employer’s premises is presumed unduly restrictive. To overcome this presumption, the employer must demonstrate that the requirement arises from a business necessity. In a letter of rebuttal, Graham argued that her live-in requirement did in fact arise from a business necessity. The Department of Labor nevertheless issued a final determination denying the application, and Graham appealed to the Board.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

Dissent

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership