Matter of Marion Graham
Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals
No. 88-INA-102 (1990)
- Written by Darya Bril, JD
Facts
Marion Graham, a United States citizen, (petitioner) submitted an application for labor certification for Gladys Yolanda Ulloa, an immigrant, for a live-in housekeeper position. On the application, Graham described the various duties required for the position. One of the conditions of employment was that the housekeeper had to live in Graham’s home. The Department of Labor denied Graham’s application on the basis that the live-in requirement was unduly restrictive, and thus in violation of 20 C.F.R. 656.21(b)(2), which requires that employers wishing to hire aliens on a permanent basis list the potential job without unduly restrictive requirements. Under the statute, a requirement that a worker live on the employer’s premises is presumed unduly restrictive. To overcome this presumption, the employer must demonstrate that the requirement arises from a business necessity. In a letter of rebuttal, Graham argued that her live-in requirement did in fact arise from a business necessity. The Department of Labor nevertheless issued a final determination denying the application, and Graham appealed to the Board.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
Dissent
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.