Matter of Pula
United States Board of Immigration Appeals
19 I. & N. Dec. 467 (1987)
- Written by Mary Katherine Cunningham, JD
Facts
Pula (defendant) arrived in the United States from Yugoslavia in June 1986. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) (plaintiff) immediately began exclusion proceedings. During the proceedings, Pula testified he was born in Albania, but when he was five years old, his family fled to Yugoslavia as refugees. Pula testified that Yugoslav police detained and assaulted him for allegedly being involved in Albanian anti-government demonstrations. Pula attempted to leave Yugoslavia in 1982, but the authorities denied him travel documents. In 1985, the government granted Pula a titre de voyage to travel to the United States, but the American embassy denied Pula a visa. Pula subsequently applied for a Yugoslav citizenship, relinquishing his refugee status. Pula testified that, due to his Yugoslav citizenship, he was denied refugee status in other European countries after he left Yugoslavia. Pula testified he purchased a fake titre de voyage in Brussels and then flew to the United States to apply for asylum. The immigration judge (IJ) found Pula had credibly testified to a clear probability of persecution if he returned to Yugoslavia but found Pula was not eligible for asylum. Pula appealed, arguing that the decision in Matter of Salim incorrectly interprets Section 208(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), resulting in the IJ giving undue weight to his use of the fraudulent travel document.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Milhollan, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Heilman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.