Matter of R-
Board of Immigration Appeals
20 I & N Dec. 621 (1992)

- Written by Katrina Sumner, JD
Facts
R- (plaintiff) was an Indian citizen and a Sikh from India’s Punjab region. In January 1991, members of a Sikh militant group known as the All India Sikh Student Federation (the federation) went to R-’s home seeking financial resources and for R- to join their group. R- refused to join, stating that although he was supportive of an independent Sikh state, he did not believe in accomplishing this objective through violence. Nevertheless, someone reported R-’s interaction with these militants, and he was arrested by the police on suspicion of being a militant. The police officers interrogated R- for information on the militants and beat him. After R-’s release without charge, the militants visited his home again and insisted that R- must join them, beat him, and threatened to kill him and a relative if he did not join them. The police and the militants continued to pursue R-. In June 1991, R- was again beaten by the police, apparently after another visit from the militant Sikhs. That same month, R- went into hiding, and he left India in September 1991. R- applied for asylum in America, claiming past persecution and fear of future persecution based on his religion and his political opinions. R- feared both the militant Sikhs and the police. R- indicated that the police in Punjab brought false charges and even killed people.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Milhollan, J.)
Concurrence (Heilman, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Dunne, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.