Matter of Rimberg
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
124 N.Y.S.3d 75, 184 A.D.3d 171 (2020)

- Written by Kate Douglas, JD
Facts
Robert L. Rimberg (defendant) was a New York attorney. A South American investor who wanted to invest $1 million in the production of a movie sought Rimberg’s assistance with the transaction. The investor gave Rimberg $1 million dollars in cash, and Rimberg deposited that money into a client account. The money was then wired to different accounts. Rimberg was told that the money was clean. Although Rimberg admitted that he had concerns about the arrangement’s legality, he proceeded anyway, ultimately receiving a $25,000 fee for his work. Rimberg later learned that the money involved in the transaction was drug money. The federal government charged Rimberg with money laundering. Rimberg subsequently pleaded guilty to a lesser charge of operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business, which was still a federal felony. Rimberg’s misconduct did not harm any of his clients. A special referee presided over associated professional disciplinary proceedings in New York. Following a mitigation hearing, the special referee issued a report. The special referee found that Rimberg’s conduct was motivated by greed. However, the special referee also found several mitigating factors. For example, Rimberg was remorseful and accepted responsibility for his actions. Moreover, Rimberg was a well-respected attorney with no prior disciplinary record. The Attorney Grievance Committee (plaintiff) moved the New York Appellate Division to confirm the special referee’s report.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.