Matter of Tolona Pizza Products Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
3 F.3d 1029 (1993)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Within 90 days prior to declaring bankruptcy, Tolona Pizza Products Corp. (Tolona) (plaintiff) made eight payments to its sausage supplier, Rose Packing Co., Inc. (Rose) (defendant), an unsecured creditor. Rose’s invoices included a due date of seven days, and the payments were made between 12 and 32 days after the invoice. However, over the course of Tolona’s business dealings with Rose, Tolona’s payments were generally made after 21 days and sometimes after 30 days—in any case, later than the 21-day threshold under which Rose allowed most of its customers to delay payments. The checks represented a full payment to Rose. However, allowing the payment to stand would put Tolona’s other creditors in the much less favorable position of receiving only 13 cents on the dollar under the reorganization plan. Tolona therefore brought an adversary proceeding to recover the payments on the ground that they constituted voidable preferences. The bankruptcy court ruled in favor of Tolona. Rose appealed. The district court reversed the bankruptcy court, finding that an exception to the preference rule—transfers in the ordinary course of business—was applicable, in part because Rose’s executive vice president had testified that Tolona’s payment times were consistent with industry-wide norms. Tolona appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.