Matter of Y-T-L-
Board of Immigration Appeals
23 I & N Dec. 601 (2003)

- Written by Katrina Sumner, JD
Facts
Y-T-L was a Chinese citizen whose wife was forced to undergo involuntary sterilization after the birth of the couple’s third child, a son, pursuant to the Chinese government’s coercive program for population control. After the births of Y-T-L’s second and third children, the government imposed fines, suspended their two daughters from school for a semester, and confiscated the land on which the family farmed to earn a living. Y-T-L-’s son was only permitted to attend school with high tuition. After Y-T-L-’s wife was sterilized in 1983, he decided to leave China. However, Y-T-L- did not leave China for another seven years. By the time Y-T-L- left in 1993, he had paid all the fines, secured employment, and was able to pay his son’s tuition. At the time of Y-T-L-’s deportation hearing, his wife and children had remained in China with no further issues for 15 years. Y-T-L- expressed concerns relating to the tuition payments for his son’s attendance at high school and college. An immigration judge (IJ) denied Y-T-L-’s applications for asylum and withholding of removal, noting that he had remained in China for seven years and his family for 15 years after his wife’s sterilization with no further persecution. The IJ determined that although Y-T-L- had experienced past persecution, the passage of that much time with no additional incidents of persecution had brought a fundamental change in conditions such that Y-T-L- did not continue to have a well-founded fear of future persecution if deported to China. Y-T-L- appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Grant, J.)
Dissent (Filppu, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.