Mattern v. West
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
12 Vet. App. 222 (1999)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
James Mattern was a World War II veteran who served in the Pacific theater in Southeast Asia. During his service, Mattern at times lived and worked among the local populations and ate locally sourced and prepared food. In 1992, Mattern was diagnosed with a type of liver cancer that was rare in the United States and Europe. Travel to Southeast Asia was considered to be a major risk factor for developing the disease, which was significantly more common in that region and other similar climates, with epidemiological studies supporting a connection between the disease and a type of fungus that occurred in the region. Mattern had only ever traveled to Southeast Asia during his service. After Mattern died from the disease in 1993, his wife, Dolores Mattern (plaintiff) filed a claim with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) (defendant) for survivors’ benefits. The VA denied her claim, holding that Mattern’s death was not service connected. Dolores appealed to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (the board). She presented evidence from all of Mattern’s private physicians, who asserted that his disease was linked to his service in Southeast Asia, as well as medical and epidemiological evidence that showed the connection between the disease and the environment in that region. The board upheld the VA’s denial of Dolores’s claim, finding that her claim was not well grounded because it failed to present evidence of a nexus between Mattern’s death and his service. Dolores appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Greene, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.