Matusevitch v. Telnikoff

877 F. Supp 1 (1995), aff'd, 159 F.3d 636 (1998)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Matusevitch v. Telnikoff

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
877 F. Supp 1 (1995), aff'd, 159 F.3d 636 (1998)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

In the 1980s, Vladimir Matusevitch (plaintiff) and Vladimir Telnikoff (defendant) lived in the former Soviet Union. Telnikoff was a journalist for the British Broadcasting Corp (BBC) who published a newspaper article criticizing the Russian-based BBC. Matusevitch, an American citizen of Jewish descent, published a letter in the same newspaper that Telnikoff’s article had appeared in, criticizing Telnikoff as a racist, anti-Semitic hate monger. Telnikoff filed a libel action against Matusevitch in English court and won a large jury verdict. Telnikoff wished to enforce the judgment in the United States. Thereafter, Matusevitch filed a suit against Telnikoff in the District of Maryland, and the action was transferred to the District of Columbia. Matusevitch sought a declaration that the English libel judgment was contrary to public policy and could not be recognized under the Uniform Foreign Money Judgments Recognition Act.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Urbina, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership