Mauldin v. Commissioner

195 F.2d 714 (1952)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mauldin v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
195 F.2d 714 (1952)

SR
Play video

Facts

In 1920, C.E. Mauldin (plaintiff) entered an agreement to purchase 160 acres of land in New Mexico. At the time, Mauldin intended to use the land for cattle feeding. However, by the time he acquired the property in 1921, he had changed his mind, in part because the cattle business was no longer a wise or profitable venture. In 1924, Mauldin attempted to sell the land but was unable to do so. In order to facilitate its sale, Mauldin subdivided the land into small lots. In 1939 and 1940, Mauldin actively sold a substantial number of lots by listing the property with real estate agents and advertising the lots throughout town. At this point, Mauldin decided to hold onto what remained of the original tract of land for investment purposes. He then entered the lumber business in 1940, after which he no longer actively advertised the lots. However, between 1940 and 1945, Mauldin’s land became the subject of popular demand. Thus, Mauldin regularly sold lots between 1940 and 1945, selling a substantial portion of them in 1945. By 1945, Mauldin only had 20 acres remaining in his possession. A large portion of his income during this time was attributable to the sale of lots. In his tax return for 1944 and 1945, Mauldin characterized the lots he sold as long-term capital assets. The Commissioner (defendant) disallowed this characterization and treated gain from the sales as ordinary income. The Tax Court sustained the Commissioner’s ruling.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Murrah, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 788,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership