May Department Stores Co. v. Wilansky

900 F. Supp. 1154 (1995)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
M
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

May Department Stores Co. v. Wilansky

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
900 F. Supp. 1154 (1995)

DM

Facts

Wilansky (defendant), an executive with May Department Stores Co. (May) (plaintiff), called a fellow May executive, Richard Battram, to inform him that Wilansky intended to resign. Wilansky was a Texas resident, and he called Battram from Texas. Battram was located at May’s headquarters in St. Louis, Missouri. Battram asked Wilansky to come to St. Louis to discuss his concerns. May then had its attorneys quickly draft a complaint for breach of contract against Wilansky. The following day, a Saturday, May sent a company jet to transport Wilansky from Texas to St. Louis. That same day, May’s attorneys convinced the federal district court to open and file May’s complaint against Wilansky. Wilansky and Battram met. When it became clear that Wilansky’s decision to resign was final, two of May’s attorneys entered Battram’s office and gave Wilansky a summons and a copy of the filed complaint. Wilansky moved to dismiss the suit for insufficient service of process under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Shaw, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Civil Procedure

Key Terms

Related Videos