Mays v. Governor of Michigan

954 N.W.2d 139 (2020)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mays v. Governor of Michigan

Michigan Supreme Court
954 N.W.2d 139 (2020)

SC

Facts

The State of Michigan (defendant) switched the water source for residents of Flint from the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department to the Flint River. Stemming from this switch, Melissa and Michael Mays and other Flint property owners (collectively, Mays) (plaintiffs) filed a class-action suit against Michigan. Mays claimed inverse condemnation and violation of Mays’s rights to bodily integrity under the state’s due-process clause. Mays alleged that the water from the Flint River caused physical harm to residents and decreased Flint property values, that the state had been warned by local officials that the Flint water-treatment plant was not suitable to handle the switch and that the water coming from the river was contaminated and not suitable for drinking, and that the state hid its knowledge of the safety of the river water from the public. The state moved for summary judgment. The court of claims denied the motion. The court of appeals affirmed. Michigan appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bernstein, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership