Mazer v. Stein
United States Supreme Court
347 U.S. 201 (1954)
Mazer and other partners in a lamp business (Mazer) (plaintiffs) created several original sculptures shaped in the form of human figures. The sculptures were used to produce casts that would allow Mazer to mass produce copies of the sculptures, which were then sold as either fully configured lamp bases or statuettes. After sales of the mass-produced copies commenced, Mazer registered the sculptures with the Copyright Office as works of art. The sculptures submitted for registration did not include any lamp components. Stein and other partners in a competing lamp business (Stein) (defendants) obtained a few of the statuettes and copied the design for their own products, and Mazer brought a suit for copyright infringement. The court of appeals granted judgment in favor of Mazer, and Stein appealed the decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Reed, J.)
Concurrence (Douglas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.