MBank Dallas, N.A. v. O'Connor (In re O'Connor)

808 F.2d 1393 (1987)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

MBank Dallas, N.A. v. O'Connor (In re O'Connor)

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
808 F.2d 1393 (1987)

Facts

William and Jane O’Connor (debtors) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and requested the bankruptcy court’s permission to use cash in a court-controlled bank account to pay for drilling three gas wells. To protect creditors’ interests in the cash, the O’Connors offered replacement liens on the proceeds from the gas wells and other unencumbered monthly income received by William. MBank Dallas, N.A. (the bank) (creditor) asserted a security interest in $721,600 cash and objected to the O’Connors’ use of the cash. At a hearing on the O’Connors’ request, the O’Connors presented evidence that the gas wells were likely to successfully produce gas and that the present value of the O’Connors’ interest in the expected cash flow from the wells was over $2.8 million. The O’Connors also presented evidence that they had other unencumbered income of $10,000 per month. The bankruptcy court granted the O’Connors leave to use the cash based on the potential revenue to be generated by the well-drilling project and the value of the monthly income offered as replacement security. The court also concluded that the bank would be adequately protected by the replacement liens proposed by the O’Connors. The district court reversed, holding that the replacement liens were too speculative to provide adequate protection as required by 11 U.S.C. § 363(e). The O’Connors appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership