McAbee v. City of Fort Payne
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
318 F.3d 1248 (2003)
- Written by Oni Harton, JD
Facts
McAbee (plaintiff) was a riparian landowner with property near a waste-treatment plant. The City of Fort Payne (city) (defendant) had a permit to discharge pollutants from the waste-treatment plant. The city violated the permit’s effluent limitations several times. When McAbee filed her citizen suit under the Clean Water Act (CWA), the city operated under an administrative enforcement order issued by the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM). The enforcement order required the city to give notice of the consent order in a newspaper of general circulation in the county where the violation occurred. The notice did not indicate that persons wishing to contest the penalty assessment had only 15 days from the date of the notice to file an administrative appeal and gave only a mailing address for those wishing for more information about the enforcement action. The city argued that two subsections of the CWA’s diligent-prosecution bar, Sections 1319(g)(6)(A)(1)(ii) and 1319(g)(6)(A)(1)(iii), barred some or all of McAbee’s claims. The district court found that the Alabama statutory scheme and the CWA are not comparable. Accordingly, the district court allowed McAbee to bring her citizen suit under the CWA.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kravitch, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.