McArthur v. Times Printing Co.
Minnesota Supreme Court
51 N.W. 216 (1892)
C.A. Nimocks was a promoter attempting to organize Times Printing Co. (Times) (defendant), a newspaper publisher. On September 12, 1889, Nimocks made a contract on behalf of Times with McArthur (plaintiff). McArthur was to work as an advertising solicitor for a one-year term beginning on October 1, Times’ supposed organization date. Times actually organized on October 16, but McArthur worked from October 1, 1889 to April 1890. Times’ officers were aware of the contract with McArthur but took no formal action to approve or object to the contract. McArthur sued for breach of contract. The jury found in favor of McArthur. Times appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Mitchell, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 168,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.