McBride v. Karumanchi
United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
2015 WL 4132974 (2015)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Courtney McBride (plaintiff) developed a rare skin disease after receiving treatment at a county hospital. McBride filed suit in federal district court in Alabama against the treating physician, Dinesh Karumanchi, M.D.; Houston County Health Care Authority (Houston County); and others (defendants). McBride alleged various claims, including medical malpractice, and asserted that the district court had diversity-of-citizenship jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, as well as federal-question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367. The district court granted several of the defendants’ motions for summary judgment and also dismissed Houston County from the action, leaving Dr. Karumanchi as the remaining defendant. Dr. Karumanchi claimed that the district court lacked diversity-of-citizenship jurisdiction to continue the matter to trial because McBride lived in Alabama at the time of filing suit. However, McBride claimed that she lived in Florida at the time. After considering the parties’ briefs on jurisdiction, the district court conducted a hearing on the matter.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thompson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.