McCarty v. E.J. Korvette, Inc.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
347 A.2d 253 (1975)
Frances McCarty (plaintiff) bought tires from E.J. Korvette, Inc. (Korvette) (defendant). The sales contract stated that the tires were guaranteed for 36,000 miles against all road hazards, including blowout. The warranty stated that if a tire failed, Korvette would replace the tire. The warranty also stated that Korvette would not be liable for consequential damages, and otherwise limited Korvette’s liability to the replacement of damaged tires. One of McCarty’s tires blew out while under warranty, causing injury to McCarty. McCarty brought suit for breach of warranty. At trial, Korvette presented no evidence that its limitation of consequential damages was not unconscionable. The trial court granted Korvette’s motion for a directed verdict. McCarty appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Davidson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.