McClain v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

40 T.C. 841 (1963)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McClain v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
40 T.C. 841 (1963)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Thomas McClain (plaintiff) was hired by Lockheed Aircraft Corp. (Lockheed) in 1936 as a file clerk and went on to work there for many years, gaining promotions in various engineering positions. Lockheed was a major company in the aerospace industry that required all employees to assign any inventions developed by an employee to Lockheed as a condition of employment. McClain executed the inventions agreement. In 1940, McClain invented a novel aircraft windshield, comprising two separate patentable ideas. In 1941 and 1942, McClain assigned the inventions to Lockheed, which became patented. Lockheed licensed and obtained substantial royalties on the patented inventions, prompting the company to roll out a patent program that encouraged employees to develop patentable inventions. The “patent plans” entitled employees to share in any royalties received from sales of patented products. Pursuant to the plans, McClain shared in royalty payments received by Lockheed, including in the tax years 1957 and 1958. McClain also received a salary for performing his job duties. Lockheed separately tracked salary payments and royalty payments made to employees but reported and deducted both types of payments as employee salary expense. McClain asserted that the royalty payments should be treated as capital gains, but the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) determined that they were ordinary income. McClain sued the IRS to recover allegedly overpaid income taxes.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Forrester, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership