From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
McClung v. Delta Square Ltd. Partnership
Tennessee Supreme Court
937 S.W.2d 891 (1996)
Facts
Dorothy McClung went shopping at a Wal-Mart in a shopping center owned by Delta Square Ltd. Partnership (collectively, the business owners) (defendants). Dorothy was returning to her car in the Wal-Mart parking lot when she was abducted at gunpoint, raped, and killed by Joseph Harper. Dorothy’s husband (plaintiff) sued the business owners for negligence in failing to provide appropriate security measures. Dorothy’s husband submitted police records indicating that the parking lot was in a high-crime area: in the 16 months preceding Dorothy’s death, 164 criminal incidents occurred in or near the parking lot, including a bomb threat, 14 burglaries, 10 robberies, 36 auto thefts, 90 larcenies, and one attempted kidnapping in the adjacent parking lot. The Wal-Mart manager testified that he would only place merchandise of very low value outside the store for sidewalk sales because of the likelihood that it would be stolen. Dorothy’s husband also pointed to the security measures at nearby businesses as well as the greater security measures at other Wal-Mart locations. The business owners claimed that adding security was cost prohibitive and would not have prevented Dorothy’s abduction. The trial court granted the business owners’ motion for summary judgment, the appellate court affirmed, and Dorothy’s husband appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
